- 2 - Background By notice dated June 30, 2004 the Court set this case for trial at the Court’s Dallas, Texas, session beginning December 6, 2004. This notice specifically stated: “YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND ENTRY OF DECISION AGAINST YOU.” Attached to this notice was the Court’s standing pretrial order. On November 2, 2004, in docket No. 20928-03, respondent filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and to impose a penalty under section 6673(a). Petitioner failed to appear at the call of these consolidated cases.2 At the call of petitioner’s cases, in docket No. 15561-04, respondent orally moved the Court to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and to impose a penalty under section 6673(a). Discussion Rule 34(b)(4) requires that a petition filed in this Court shall contain clear and concise assignments of each and every error that the taxpayer alleges to have been committed by the Commissioner in the determination of the deficiency and the additions to tax or penalties in dispute. Rule 34(b)(5) further 1(...continued) Procedure. 2 On Nov. 22, 2004, the Court granted respondent’s motion to consolidate.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011