- 8 - irrelevant to the issues in these cases. See Greenberg’s Express, Inc. v. Commissioner, 62 T.C. 324, 327 (1974). Petitioners’ concession in the stipulation that they bear the burden of proof on all issues is consistent with their failure to cooperate during the course of the audit, the absence of required books and records during the audit or at trial, and their failure to present credible evidence at trial. See sec. 7491(a). Because of their concession, it is unnecessary for us to make any findings concerning events occurring during the audit. Respondent does not dispute that petitioners would be entitled to offset against gross receipts any substantiated deductions attributable to Bioactive Kansas Trust. However, petitioners produced only Bonnie Stejskal’s vague testimony, which did not identify, explain, or quantify any of the alleged deductions and expenses. There is no evidentiary basis in this record for any estimates of deductible expenses. See Williams v. United States, 245 F.2d 559 (5th Cir. 1957); Vanicek v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 731, 743 (1985). Petitioners have failed to prove that they are entitled to any adjustments other than those set forth in the stipulations. To give effect to the stipulations, Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011