Michael Jack Stephens - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Court to require the                 
          taxpayer to pay a penalty not in excess of $25,000 when it                  
          appears to the Court that, inter alia, proceedings have been                
          instituted or maintained by the taxpayer primarily for delay or             
          that the taxpayer's position in such proceeding is frivolous or             
          groundless.3  In Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576, 581                 
          (2000), we issued a warning to taxpayers concerning the                     
          imposition of a penalty under section 6673(a)(1) on those                   
          taxpayers abusing the protections afforded by sections 6320 and             
          6330 through the bringing of dilatory or frivolous lien or levy             
          actions.  The Court has since repeatedly disposed of cases                  
          premised on arguments akin to those raised herein summarily and             
          with imposition of the section 6673 penalty.  See, e.g., Craig v.           
          Commissioner, 119 T.C. 252, 264-265 (2002) (and cases cited                 
          therein).                                                                   
               Respondent has not sought a section 6673 penalty in this               
          case, and the Court declines to impose such a penalty because the           
          record contains no evidence that petitioner has been warned                 
          expressly that we may do so under the circumstances extant                  
          herein.  However, petitioner is now so warned.  If petitioner               
          insists on asserting frivolous and irrelevant arguments in the              




               3Respondent did not move for a penalty under sec.                      
          6673(a)(1).  However, the Court considers this issue sua sponte.            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011