Thomasita Taylor - Page 18

                                       - 18 -                                         
          has upheld collection action where taxpayers were provided with             
          literal transcripts of account (so-called MFTRAX).  See, e.g.,              
          Frank v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-88; Swann v. Commissioner,           
          T.C. Memo. 2003-70.  The June 11, 2003, letter to petitioner from           
          the settlement officer enclosed copies of Forms 4340 for each               
          year.                                                                       
               Petitioner has also denied receiving the “Notices of                   
          Assessment”, presumably alluding to the notice and demand for               
          payment that section 6303(a) establishes should be given within             
          60 days of the making of an assessment.  However, a notice of               
          balance due constitutes a notice and demand for payment within              
          the meaning of section 6303(a).  Craig v. Commissioner, supra at            
          262-263.  The Forms 4340 indicate that petitioner was sent                  
          notices of balance due for the tax years involved, and petitioner           
          has never denied receiving these notices.  At trial, the Court              
          explained to petitioner that no “magic words” were necessary;               
          rather, “If the substance of the notice is that you owe money and           
          for what year and how much, that may be sufficient to meet the              
          statutory requirements.”  Petitioner at that point made no                  
          attempt to argue that she had failed to receive such a notice or            
          notices.                                                                    
               Thus, with respect to those issues enumerated in section               
          6330(c)(2)(A) and subject to review in collection proceedings for           
          abuse of discretion, petitioner has not raised any spousal                  






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011