Michael E. Thibodeaux & Stephanie R. Thibodeaux, a.k.a. Stephanie R. Hearn - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
               In this case, specific substantiation rules come into play             
          as the deductions here in dispute, although of a type generally             
          allowable under section 162(a), are further described in and                
          subject to section 274(d).  In general, that section provides               
          that no deduction shall be allowed for any travel expense or                
          entertainment expense unless the taxpayer substantiates by                  
          adequate records the following items:  (1) The amount of such               
          expense; (2) the time and place of the travel or entertainment;             
          (3) the business purpose of the expense; and (4) the business               
          relationship to the taxpayer of persons entertained.  Sec.                  
          274(d); sec. 1.274-5T(b)(2) and (3), Temporary Income Tax Regs.,            
          50 Fed. Reg. 46014-46015 (Nov. 6, 1985).                                    
               Under the applicable regulations, to meet the “adequate                
          records” requirement of section 274(d), a taxpayer “shall                   
          maintain an account book, diary, log, statement of expense,                 
          trip sheets, or similar record * * * and documentary evidence               
          * * * which, in combination, are sufficient to establish each               
          element of an expenditure”.  Sec. 1.274-5T(c)(2)(i), Temporary              
          Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46017 (Nov. 6, 1985).  The record-           
          keeping requirements of section 274(d) contemplate that a record            
          “made at or near the time of the expenditure or use, supported by           
          sufficient documentary evidence, has a high degree of credibility           
          not present with respect to a statement prepared subsequent                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011