- 6 - On June 27, 2002, the Appeals officer held a telephone hearing with petitioner. During the hearing, petitioner informed the Appeals officer that he would submit an offer in compromise based on doubt as to collectibility by August 1, 2002. On August 1, 2002, petitioner notified the Appeals officer that he would need an additional 2 weeks to file the offer in compromise. On August 27, 2002, the Appeals officer notified petitioner by letter that he had an additional 2 weeks to submit an offer in compromise. On January 29, 2003, petitioner’s case was transferred to a different Appeals officer. This Appeals officer determined that there had been no action by petitioner with respect to his offer in compromise. On May 16, 2003, the Appeals officer notified petitioner that he had until June 9, 2003, to submit his offer in compromise. The Appeals officer provided petitioner with a Form 656, Offer in Compromise, and a Form 433-A, Collection Information Statement for Wage Earners and Self-Employed Individuals. On June 11, 2003, petitioner submitted to the Appeals officer a Form 656 based on doubt as to liability, and a Form 433-A. In the offer in compromise, petitioner stated that “This tax was a result of a bank charging off a loan they made to aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011