Tribune Company, As Agent of and Successor By Merger to the Former the Times Mirror Company, Itself and its Consolidated Subsidiaries - Page 26

                                       - 114 -                                        
               make business acquisitions or any other transaction to                 
               the benefit of Times Mirror.  The only limitation is                   
               that Times Mirror may not upstream LLC assets to                       
               itself.                                                                
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
               Times Mirror has the ability to ensure that the Board                  
               of Directors of Acquisition Parent may not do anything                 
               that may affect the control or viability of the LLC.                   
               Certain board actions require the unanimous vote of the                
               Board.  These include:                                                 
               •    the incurrence of indebtedness or guarantees of                   
                    indebtedness of Acquisition Parent                                
               •    the sale, transfer or other disposition, pledge or                
                    assignment of any portion or all of its LLC                       
                    interest                                                          
               •    the issuance of any other securities of                           
                    Acquisition Parent                                                
               All of these factors indicate that Times Mirror not                    
               only controls the assets of the LLC, but also is the                   
               beneficiary of all of the ownership risks and rewards                  
               of the LLC.  * * *                                                     
               We cannot improve on the descriptions of the Bender                    
          transaction in the above contemporaneous statements of the                  
          participants.  Little more would be required to conclude that the           
          Bender transaction was, in substance, a sale.  The issue in this            
          case, however, is to determine whether the “reorganization”                 
          structure satisfies the requirements of sections 354(a) and 368             
          and precludes taxation of the gain derived from the transaction.            
          Fiduciary Obligations Among the Parties                                     
               In the context of the dispute over the value of the MB                 
          Parent common stock received by TMD, as discussed below,                    






Page:  Previous  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011