Tribune Company, As Agent of and Successor By Merger to the Former the Times Mirror Company, Itself and its Consolidated Subsidiaries - Page 59

                                       - 23 -                                         
          with Wolters Kluwer, Times Mirror informed Reed that it had                 
          received a significant offer from another bidder that had                   
          accepted the use of the CJV structure for the Bender transaction.           
          Times Mirror also informed Reed that Reed would have to respond             
          promptly if it wished to remain in the running for Bender and               
          Times Mirror’s 50-percent interest in Shepard’s.                            
               By letter dated April 23, 1998, Reed submitted to Times                
          Mirror an offer to acquire Bender and Times Mirror’s 50-percent             
          interest in Shepard’s “for a cash consideration of $1.65 billion            
          and on the terms and conditions reflected in the mark-up of the             
          Agreement and Plan of Merger.”  In its offer letter, Reed                   
          accepted the use of the CJV structure for its purchase of Bender.           
          Reed’s offer was conditioned on Times Mirror’s acceptance of the            
          offer by Friday, April 24, 1998, at 5 p.m. “(Los Angeles time)”.            
               M.  Times Mirror Responds to Wolters Kluwer’s Offer                    
               On April 23, 1998, Unterman sent a letter to Wolters Kluwer            
          in response to Wolters Kluwer’s offer to acquire Bender and Times           
          Mirror’s 50-percent interest in Shepard’s.  Unterman included the           
          following statements in this letter:                                        
               there is one aspect of the proposal which is                           
               structurally defective, and precludes us from complying                
               with the conditions set forth in your letter.  The                     
               insertion in your mark-up of a guaranty by MB Parent of                
               Matthew Bender’s post-Merger indebtedness to you                       
               materially changes the economic and risk profile of the                
               transaction in that it creates a significant contingent                
               liability for MB Parent, the repository of our sales                   
               proceeds.  While we assume that you did not intend this                
               provision as a mechanism to place our sales proceeds at                





Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011