GillisTriplett - Page 10

                                        - 9 -                                         
          and records.  In effect, petitioner was using a claimed church as           
          his pocket book.  Therefore, the Court agrees with respondent,              
          and the Center also fails the “private inurement” test of section           
          501(c)(3).  Because petitioner’s contributions were to a                    
          nonexempt organization, they are not deductible on his Federal              
          income tax return.6  Therefore, respondent is sustained on this             
          issue.                                                                      
               Respondent determined section 6662(a) penalties in the                 
          amounts of $743.20, $496.60, $439.40, and $688.00 for the years             
          1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001, respectively.  Section 6662 provides            
          for a 20-percent penalty for any underpayment to which the                  
          section applies.  Sec. 6662(a).  Respondent determined that                 
          section 6662(a) applied because petitioner was negligent or                 
          disregarded rules or regulations.  Sec. 6662(b)(1).                         
               Negligence is defined as “any failure to make a reasonable             
          attempt to comply with the provisions of this title”.  Disregard            
          includes “careless, reckless, or intentional disregard”.  Sec.              
          6662(c).  The entirety of petitioner’s deductions for the years             


               6Only a fraction of the amounts claimed as charitable                  
          contributions on petitioner’s Federal income tax returns were in            
          the form of cash donations.  The bulk of the deductions were for            
          payments petitioner made out of his personal bank account “on               
          behalf” of the Center, such as rent, natural gas and electricity            
          for petitioner’s personal residence, religious books, and office            
          supplies.  Because the Court has denied the deduction of                    
          contributions to the Center by petitioner, it is not necessary to           
          discuss the eligibility of the nature of petitioner’s                       
          contributions.                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011