David K. and Alice Vanarsdall - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
          Husband to Wife under the provisions of this Article shall                  
          constitute property settlement and not maintenance or alimony”.             
               During the year 2000, Mr. Vanarsdall made cash payments to             
          the former spouse from his portion of the partnership income                
          totaling $18,398.  On his 2000 joint Federal income tax return,             
          petitioner claimed an alimony deduction for the entire amount.              
          In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the deduction            
          and made no other adjustments (except for the computational                 
          adjustments on the itemized deductions).                                    
               The sole issue is whether the payments to the former spouse            
          during 2000 constitute alimony under section 215(a).4                       
               Section 71(a) provides generally that alimony payments are             
          included in the gross income of the payee spouse, and section               
          215(a) provides generally that alimony payments are deductible by           
          the payor spouse.  Section 215(b) provides in pertinent part that           
          the term “alimony” means any alimony, as defined in section                 
          71(b), which is includable in the gross income of the recipient             
          under section 71.  Section 71(b) defines alimony as follows:                

                    SEC. 71(b).  Alimony or Separate Maintenance Payments             
               Defined.--For purposes of this section–-                               
                         (1) In General.--The term “alimony or separate               
                    maintenance payment” means any payment in cash if–-               

               4The facts are not in dispute, and the issue is a question             
          of law; therefore, with respect to the burden of proof, the Court           
          need not address the applicability of sec. 7491.  Higbee v.                 
          Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438 (2001).                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011