Carol L. Van Dyke - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               The petition in this case was filed in response to a Notice            
          of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section              
          6320 and/or 6330 (the notice).  Petitioner seeks review of the              
          determination to proceed with collection of her tax liabilities             
          for 1992, 1993, 1995, and 2000.  The issue for decision is                  
          whether respondent may proceed with collection action as                    
          determined in the notice.                                                   
               Stipulated facts and exhibits received into evidence are               
          incorporated herein by reference.  At the time the petition in              
          this case was filed, petitioner resided in Denver, Colorado.                
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioner was sent notices of deficiency for 1992 and 2000.           
          Petitioner did not file a petition with the Court for either                
          year.                                                                       
               According to the notice, at the hearing under section                  
          6330(b) and (c), petitioner claimed that her Federal income tax             
          returns for 1992, 1993, and 1995 were falsified by her estranged            
          husband or someone else.                                                    
          The Petition and Amended Petition                                           
               Petitioner alleges in her petition that she went to the                
          Internal Revenue Service (IRS) office on Speer Boulevard in                 
          Denver, Colorado, to discuss her tax matters and that the office,           
          in the "Ceaser Chavez" building "may be a fraudulent office".               
          She alleges that several years ago she showed the IRS that the              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011