Thiele L. Wetzel - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               Petitioner attached a letter to his hearing request in which           
          he alleged:  (1) He had received no taxable income and had no               
          taxable activity and thus had no filing requirement; (2)                    
          respondent had not prepared proper substitute for returns under             
          section 6020(b) in that they were not signed by the Secretary and           
          were not on a form approved by the Office of Management and                 
          Budget (OMB); (3) the lien was fabricated; and (4) the assessment           
          was unlawful.                                                               
               On May 29, 2003, respondent sent petitioner copies of Forms            
          4340, Certificates of Assessment, Payments, and Other Specified             
          Matters, for 1994-99.  Petitioner sent numerous letters to                  
          respondent replete with the arguments described above and                   
          additional arguments including: (1) Respondent failed to provide            
          him with Form 23C, Assessment Certificate - Summary Record of               
          Assessments; (2) imposition of the lien was a denial of due                 
          process; and (3) respondent’s agents who worked on petitioner’s             
          case should be prosecuted.                                                  
               On October 31, 2003, respondent sent petitioner a Notice of            
          Determination Concerning Collection Actions under section 6320              
          and/or 6330, in which respondent stated that all applicable laws            
          and administrative procedures had been met and that collection              
          from petitioner of his tax liability for 1994-99 would proceed.             
          Respondent determined that petitioner had raised only frivolous             
          issues and warned petitioner that he may be held liable for a               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011