Steve J. Work - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
               Petitioner testified that Joe Stevens appraised the bag at             
          $1,900.  Petitioner testified that he donated the bag to the                
          DMNH, and Ms. Herold could confirm this.  Petitioner did not call           
          Mr. Stevens or Ms. Herold as a witness.  We infer that their                
          testimony would not have been favorable to petitioner.  See                 
          Wichita Terminal Elevator Co. v. Commissioner, 6 T.C. 1158, 1165            
          (1946), affd. 162 F.2d 513 (10th Cir. 1947).                                
               To the extent that petitioner relies on his own testimony to           
          establish that he donated the bag, we found petitioner’s                    
          testimony to be conclusory and contradictory of the documentary             
          evidence.  Petitioner stated the value of the bag to be $101-               
          $500--far less than the $960 he claimed.  Petitioner wrote that             
          he might donate the bag if it would be displayed (suggesting he             
          would not donate the bag if it was not displayed), and petitioner           
          was informed that the bag would not be displayed.   Furthermore,            
          Ms. Herold’s memorandum dated May 24, 1999, makes clear that                
          petitioner had not yet donated the bag.                                     
               The Court is not required to accept petitioner’s                       
          unsubstantiated testimony.  See Wood v. Commissioner, 338 F.2d              
          602, 605 (9th Cir. 1964), affg. 41 T.C. 593 (1964).  Under the              
          circumstances presented here, we are not required to, and                   
          generally do not, rely on petitioner’s testimony to sustain his             
          burden of establishing error in respondent’s determinations.  See           
          Lerch v. Commissioner, 877 F.2d 624, 631-632 (7th Cir. 1989),               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011