Georges Z. Zakhem - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined the following deficiencies in and                
          additions to petitioner’s Federal income taxes for 1995, 1996,              
          and 1997:                                                                   
                                   Additions to Tax Under Sections                    
          Year      Deficiency     6651(a)(1)     6651(a)(2)     6654                 
          1995      $4,856         $610                --        $118                 
          1996      6,978          758            $843           158                  
          1997      10,243         1,047          1,163          216                  

               After concessions,1 the issues for decision are: (1) Whether           
          respondent’s period of limitations within which to assess the               
          1995, 1996, and 1997 Federal income taxes against Georges Z.                
          Zakhem (petitioner) has expired; and (2) if not, whether                    
          petitioner is liable for additions to tax under sections                    
          6651(a)(1) and 6654.                                                        
                                     Background                                       
               The stipulated facts and exhibits received into evidence are           
          incorporated herein by reference.  At the time the petition in              
          this case was filed, petitioner resided in Boulder, Colorado.               
               During the taxable years at issue, petitioner was employed             
          by Exabyte Corporation (Exabyte) in Boulder, Colorado.  For the             
          years 1995, 1996, and 1997, Exabyte issued Forms W-2, Wage and              
          Tax Statement, to petitioner which incorrectly reported                     
          petitioner’s Social Security number by one digit.  By letter                


               1Respondent concedes that the addition to tax under sec.               
          6654 asserted in the notice of deficiency for 1995 and the                  
          additions to tax under sec. 6651(a)(2) asserted in the notices of           
          deficiency for 1996 and 1997 do not apply to this case.                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011