Walter Michael Alley - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          Farmington, New Mexico, on the date the petition was filed in               
          this case.                                                                  
               During taxable years 2000 and 2001, petitioner was employed            
          by Pacific Industrial Electric, Inc. (Pacific) as a field                   
          superintendent.  As field superintendent, petitioner was                    
          responsible for all aspects of total on-site job management and             
          supervision.  Petitioner’s duties included but were not limited             
          to:  personnel supervision, work assignments, work schedule                 
          management, materials ordering, materials management, customer              
          and inspector interaction, and tool and equipment management.               
               Pacific did not have a formal written expense reimbursement            
          policy during taxable years 2000 and 2001.  However, Pacific’s              
          verbal reimbursement policy, as relevant in the present case, was           
          to pay every employee $25 per day for the use of a personal                 
          vehicle while driving on corporate business.                                
               During taxable year 2000, petitioner used his personal                 
          vehicle, a Ford pickup truck, for 135 days while driving on                 
          business.  In accordance with Pacific’s verbal reimbursement                
          policy, petitioner received payments from Pacific totaling $3,375           
          for the taxable year 2000.                                                  
               During taxable year 2001, petitioner used his personal                 
          vehicle for 282 days while driving on business.  Again, in                  
          accordance with Pacific’s verbal reimbursement policy, petitioner           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011