- 49 - delayed the recognition of income until the retained conduits were later sold. Respondent’s contention assumes that Qwest knew the amount of future economic benefit it would realize from the retained conduits at the time it made the cost allocations. Respondent focuses on Qwest’s 1995 five-year plan, which stated Qwest’s goal of offering 15,502 miles of conduit for sale to third-party customers. The 1995 five-year plan estimated that, if the conduit were sold at an average of $30,000 per conduit mile, this would generate revenue of $465 million. Respondent also notes that after the years in issue, Qwest was able to sell most of its retained conduits. Respondent fails to consider the extensive testimony and evidence that, at the time the allocations were made, the value of the retained conduits was uncertain. The estimated value of the retained conduits at $30,000 per mile could be realized only if the conduits were actually sold. At the time of installation, Qwest did not have customers lined up to purchase the retained conduits. In its report to Qwest, CLC concluded that the country did not need another nationwide fiberoptic network, and Qwest’s installation of additional conduits would be “very risky” and its revenue projections “may be optimistic”. Further, Mr. Anschutz and Mr. O’Callaghan credibly testified that installing additionalPage: Previous 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011