- 4 - rate (adjusted by the statutorily prescribed cost-of-living adjustment) as provided under section 7430(c)(1)(B)(iii).4 Respondent generally contests5 the reasonableness of the estates’ claim for fees and costs, based on the following contentions: (1) Attorney’s fees claimed for services of an attorney called by the estates as an expert witness are not allowable; (2) litigation fees and costs appear duplicated because the issues were the same as to both estates and the estates were billed similar amounts; (3) the quantity of hours billed for some of the tasks appears unreasonable for a single issue (valuation) case. We address each of respondent’s contentions separately. Attorney’s Fee Claimed for Attorney Who Was Initially Called as an Expert Witness. Background The estates intended to proffer at trial Attorney Edward B. Benjamin, Jr. as an expert witness on the subject of co-ownership and partition or real property under Louisiana law. Respondent moved in limine to exclude Attorney Benjamin’s report, which was 4 The estates’ claim of attorney’s fees is based on the adjusted statutory hourly rate (as opposed to the actual rate billed) of $130 for 1999, Rev. Proc. 98-61, 1998-2 C.B. 811; $140 for 2000 and 2001, Rev. Proc. 99-42, 1999-2 C.B. 568 and Rev. Proc. 2001-13, 2001-1 C.B. 337; and $150 for 2002, Rev. Proc. 2002-59, 2001-2 C.B. 623. 5 Respondent also contested the hourly rate claimed in the estates’ initial motions, but the estates conceded that the rate should be limited to the adjusted statutory hourly rate.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011