Larry G. and Mary L. Bangs - Page 2

                                         -2-                                          
          accuracy-related penalty.  For 2000, respondent determined an               
          $11,159 deficiency and determined that petitioners were liable              
          for a $2,231 accuracy-related penalty.  For 2001, respondent                
          determined a $7,605 deficiency and determined that petitioners              
          were liable for a $1,521 accuracy-related penalty.  For 2002,               
          respondent determined an $11,413 deficiency and determined that             
          petitioners were liable for a $2,282 accuracy-related penalty.              
               After concessions, there are three issues for decision.  The           
          first issue is whether petitioners engaged in their lemon farming           
          activity for profit.  We hold they did not.2                                
               The second issue is whether petitioners are liable for taxes           
          on interest and capital gains they admit they earned during the             
          years at issue but which were erroneously omitted on the Form               
          4549A, Income Tax Examination Changes, petitioners signed.  We              
          hold petitioners are liable for the taxes on the interest and               
          capital gains.                                                              
               The third issue is whether petitioners are liable for the              
          accuracy-related penalty.  We hold they are liable for the                  
          accuracy-related penalty except with respect to the portion of              
          the understatement attributable to the lemon farming activity.              





               2If we had found petitioners engaged in their lemon farming            
          activity for profit, we would have then been asked to consider              
          whether petitioners should have capitalized, rather than                    
          deducted, their expenses relating to their lemon farming                    
          activity.  Because of our holding on the for profit issue, we               
          need not address the capitalization issue under sec. 263A.                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011