Larry G. and Mary L. Bangs - Page 21

                                        -21-                                          
          covers only specific matters; in this case, the treatment of the            
          trusts.  The closing agreement does not cover other issues or               
          determine petitioners’ tax liability for the years at issue.                
          Urbano v. Commissioner, supra.  Accordingly, the closing                    
          agreement does not prevent respondent from determining                      
          deficiencies or penalties for the years at issue.  In fact, the             
          parties agreed in the closing agreement that petitioners would              
          report all income, expenses, and deductions on their individual             
          returns for the years at issue.  The closing agreement also                 
          provides that petitioners will be liable for additional taxes,              
          penalties, and interest that may arise on their individual                  
          returns by collapsing the trusts.  Accordingly, the terms of the            
          closing agreement provide that petitioners shall be liable for              
          taxes on their income for the years at issue.                               
               Respondent was therefore not prevented from determining that           
          petitioners owe taxes on interest income and capital gains they             
          admitted they received during the years at issue.  We find that             
          petitioners are liable for these taxes.                                     
          IV. Whether Petitioners Are Liable for the Accuracy-Related                 
               Penalty                                                                
               The next issue is whether petitioners are liable for the               
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a).  Respondent                 
          determined that petitioners were negligent and therefore liable             
          for the penalty.7                                                           

               7Respondent also asserts that petitioners substantially                
          understated their tax and are therefore liable.  Because we find            
          that petitioners were negligent, we need not consider whether               
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011