- 11 - Emmons v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-265. Furthermore, “the employer bears the risk of loss because the employer is contractually obligated to pay the retirement benefit specified in the plan.” Id. At one point during his testimony, petitioner referred to the plan as a defined contribution pension plan. This may have been inadvertent.4 In any case, petitioner’s testimony was contradicted by that of Alyce Wong, benefits supervisor for the San Francisco City and County Employees Retirement System (the retirement system). Ms. Wong testified that the plan to which petitioner belongs is a defined benefit plan. She explained that petitioner’s monthly retirement benefits were calculated based on his age at retirement, years of service, and highest average rate of compensation. She also explained that petitioner’s contributions to the plan do not affect the amount of retirement benefits he receives. Thus, even if petitioner’s contributions to his retirement fund were exhausted, his retirement benefits would continue unchanged. Accordingly, we conclude that the plan is a qualified defined benefit plan under section 401(a). In general, section 72(a) requires amounts received as an 4 A publication produced by the retirement system describes the plan as a defined benefit plan. This publication is included as an exhibit to the stipulation of facts, and petitioner made frequent reference to it during trial.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011