Richard Orin Berge - Page 9

                                        - 8 -                                         
                    Promise without intent to perform.  Defendant made a              
                    promise about a material matter without any intention             
                    of performing it as follows:                                      
                    Defendant promised to repay plaintiff for money lent to           
                    him and paid for his benefit and on his behalf, by                
                    plaintiff.  Plaintiff would not have lent defendant               
                    money, nor paid money for his benefit if plaintiff had            
                    known that defendant did not intend to repay plaintiff.           
                    Defendant was to repay plaintiff upon his graduation              
                    from law school.  Plaintiff is informed and believes              
                    that defendant has graduated from law school.                     
                    Defendant has failed and refused to repay plaintiff.              
                    Plaintiff, Donna Wold, discovered defendant’s intention           
                    not to perform within the last year.                              
               In justifiable reliance upon defendant’s conduct, plaintiff            
               was induced to act as follows:                                         
                    Plaintiff lent money to defendant and paid money for              
                    the benefit, and on behalf of, defendant in the total             
                    sum of $50,978.                                                   
                    Because of plaintiff’s reliance upon defendant’s                  
               conduct, plaintiff has been damaged in the sum of $50,978.             
                         Fourth Cause of Action - Conversion                          
               Plaintiff, Donna Wold, alleges that defendant, Richard O.              
               Berge, was the legal (proximate) cause of damages to                   
               plaintiff.  By the following acts or omissions to act,                 
               defendant intentionally caused the damage to plaintiff on or           
               about a date uncertain at this time, discovered within 1               
               year, at Orange County, California.                                    
               Defendant converted a coin collection belonging to, and in             
               the custody and control of plaintiff.  Defendant converted             
               said coin collection to his own use without the permission             
               or consent or knowledge of plaintiff.  Defendant has failed            
               and refused to return the coin collection to plaintiff or              
               its reasonable value of $18,000 despite demand therefore.              
               Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that            
               defendant has sold the coin collection and has retained                
               and/or spent the proceeds for his own use or benefit.                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011