Susan Bocock and Jack Carl Ryals - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          paid with their request for an extension to file, and an                    
          overpayment of $17,645 and requested a refund of $17,585.5                  
          Pursuant to section 6402(a), respondent credited to Mr. Ryals’s             
          1978 income tax liability $10,406.63 of petitioners’ claimed                
          overpayment.                                                                
               Respondent later determined a deficiency in petitioners’               
          income tax of $18,481 and a section 6662(a) penalty of $3,696 for           
          their 2002 taxable year and sent petitioners a notice of                    
          deficiency on March 28, 2005.  Petitioners timely petitioned this           
          Court.                                                                      
               At the call of the instant case for trial during the Court’s           
          trial session on January 23, 2006, the parties appeared and                 
          represented to the Court that the case was settled and filed a              
          stipulation of settled issues.  We granted the parties an                   
          additional 30 days to submit a decision document.  After the                
          trial session, a dispute arose between the parties regarding                
          whether certain payments petitioners intended to be applied to              
          their 2002 taxable year were properly credited to earlier years             


               4(...continued)                                                        
          that petitioners intended as an estimated tax payment for 2003,             
          but that respondent credited to Mr. Ryals’s 1977 tax liability.             
          See supra note 3.  For the reasons explained below, we do not               
          have jurisdiction to decide whether respondent improperly                   
          credited Mr. Ryals’s earlier tax liabilities.                               
               5The record does not indicate why petitioners requested a              
          refund that was $60 less than the amount of their claimed                   
          overpayment.                                                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011