- 4 - receipts of $45,153, expenses of $61,219, and a net loss of $16,066.2 In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed the entire loss. For purposes of this case, respondent does not challenge the accuracy of the claimed expenses or the amount of income reported. Respondent’s sole basis for disallowing the claimed expenses is that, as a matter of law, petitioners are not entitled to deductions for such expenses. Petitioners contend that the expenses were incurred in connection with their trade or business, and, therefore, such expenses are deductible. Petitioners also contend that, while their return was under audit, they received a refund of $1.30, and, because of that refund, petitioners believed that their claimed expenses had been allowed. The issuance of a refund does not preclude Commissioner from issuing a notice of deficiency. Gordon v. United States, 757 F.2d 1157, 1160 (11th Cir. 1985); Beer v. Commissioner, 733 F.2d 435, 437 (6th Cir. 1984), affg. T.C. Memo. 1982-735; Warner v. Commissioner 526 F.2d 1, 2 (9th Cir. 1975), affg. T.C. Memo. 1974-243. The taxpayers in Gordon v. United States, supra, and 2The Schedule C expenses consisted of: Meals & entertainment (net) $12,775 Utilities 744 Other expenses, identified only as dues of $250 and per diem of $47,450 47,700 The per diem was not described by petitioners at trial.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011