Henry Broderick - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          $12,392 in petitioner’s Federal income tax for 2002, and a                  
          $2,478.40 penalty under section 6662(a).  Unless otherwise                  
          indicated, all section references are to sections of the Internal           
          Revenue Code in effect for 2002, and all Rule references are to             
          the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.  Henry R.                    
          Broderick, and his spouse, Denise F. Broderick, filed a joint               
          Federal income tax return for 2002, and respondent’s notice of              
          deficiency is addressed to both of them.  However, only Henry               
          (petitioner) filed a petition in response thereto.  Petitioner              
          resided in New Jersey when he filed his petition.                           
               There is a confused state of the record in this case; some             
          of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.                         
               Petitioner is the sole shareholder of Woodside Consulting,             
          Inc. (Woodside), a corporation which petitioner considers to be             
          taxable as a small business corporation consistent with                     
          subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code.  For the taxable year            
          2002, Woodside filed an untimely tax return on Form 1120S, U.S.             
          Income Tax Return for an S Corporation.  The return reflects that           
          for 2002, Woodside had gross receipts of $2,956 and an ordinary             
          loss of $29,000.  Petitioner’s items from Woodside are                      
          essentially uncoordinated with his Form 1040, U.S. Individual               
          Income Tax Return, items; so we have dealt with both returns as a           
          single unit.  Respondent concedes that petitioner erroneously               
          indicated on Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss, of his               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011