Carl F. and Frances R. Butler - Page 10

                                        - 9 -                                         
          have not substantiated medical and dental expenses incurred                 
          during taxable year 2002 above the amount of $4,468.                        
               Section 213(a) allows as a deduction any expenses that are             
          paid during the taxable year for the medical care of the                    
          taxpayer, his spouse, and dependents, and that are not                      
          compensated for by insurance or otherwise.  Estate of Smith v.              
          Commissioner, 79 T.C. 313, 318 (1982).  The deduction is allowed            
          only to the extent the amount exceeds 7.5 percent of adjusted               
          gross income.  Sec. 213(a); sec. 1.213-1(a)(3), Income Tax Regs.            
          The term “medical care” includes amounts paid “for the diagnosis,           
          cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease, or for the            
          purpose of affecting any structure or function of the body”.                
          Sec. 213(d)(1)(A); Estate of Smith v. Commissioner, supra at 318-           
          319.                                                                        
               Petitioners claim they are entitled to a deduction of                  
          $10,723 for medical expenses incurred as a result of Carla’s                
          cancer treatments, Mr. Butler’s heart ailments, and other                   
          miscellaneous medical expenses relating to Mrs. Butler and                  
          petitioners’ other children.                                                
               At trial, petitioners offered into evidence handwritten                
          lists of medical expenses they claim were incurred during taxable           
          year 2002.  However, some expenses on these lists are                       
          inconsistent with previous statements made by petitioners.  We              
          have taken into consideration all of the documents offered into             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011