- 11 -
Petitioners contend that they are eligible to claim the
disabled access credit under section 44(a) because (1) they had
an eligible small business, and (2) their investment in the
program was an eligible access expenditure. Respondent contends,
among other things, that a subscription to the program is not
necessary to comply with the ADA and thus is not an eligible
access expenditure pursuant to section 44(c).
In order for an expenditure to qualify as an eligible access
expenditure within the meaning given that term by section 44(c),
the expenditure must have been made to enable an eligible small
business to comply with the applicable requirements under the
ADA. Arevalo v. Commissioner, supra; Fan v. Commissioner, 117
T.C. 32 (2001).
Title IV of the ADA requires “Each common carrier providing
telephone voice transmission services” to provide “throughout the
area in which it offers service, telecommunications relay
services”. 47 U.S.C. sec. 225(c) (2000). “Telecommunications
relay services” is defined as:
telephone transmission services that provide the ability for
an individual who has a hearing impairment or speech
impairment to engage in communication by wire or radio with
a hearing individual in a manner that is functionally
equivalent to the ability of an individual who does not have
a hearing impairment or speech impairment to communicate
using voice communication services by wire or radio. Such
term includes services that enable two-way communication
between an individual who uses a TDD or other nonvoice
terminal device and an individual who does not use such a
device. [47 U.S.C. sec. 225(a)(3).]
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011