- 21 - that of numerous taxpayers who claimed tax shelter deductions in the 1980s and 1990s, obtained the tax advantages, promptly forgot about their “investment”, and now realize that paying their taxes will require a change of lifestyle.11 See Barnes v. Commissioner, supra. We also agree with a claim by respondent that compromising petitioners’ case on grounds of public policy or equity would not promote effective tax administration. While petitioners portray themselves as victims of Hoyt’s alleged fraud and respondent’s alleged delay in dealing with Hoyt, they take no responsibility for their tax predicament. We cannot agree that acceptance by respondent of petitioners’ $100,000 offer to satisfy their approximately $275,000 tax liability would enhance voluntary compliance by other taxpayers. A compromise on that basis would place the Government in the unenviable role of an insurer against poor business decisions by taxpayers, reducing the incentive for taxpayers to investigate thoroughly the consequences of 11 Of course, the examples in the regulations are not meant to be exhaustive, and petitioners have a more sympathetic case than the taxpayers in Fargo v. Commissioner, 447 F.3d at 714, for whom the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit noted that “no evidence was presented to suggest that Taxpayers were the subject of fraud or deception”. Such considerations, however, have not kept this Court from finding investors in Hoyt’s shelters to be culpable of negligence, most recently in Keller v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-131, nor prevented the Courts of Appeals for the Sixth and Tenth Circuits from affirming our decisions to that effect in Mortensen v. Commissioner, 440 F.3d 375 (6th Cir. 2006), affg. T.C. Memo. 2004-279, and Van Scoten v. Commissioner, 439 F.3d 1243 (10th Cir. 2006), affg. T.C. Memo. 2004-275.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011