William Edward and Patricia Marie Colombell - Page 9

                                        - 8 -                                         
          taxpayer with a zero balance in her account.  During the 15 years           
          petitioner worked for Inova, she never once met the threshold for           
          pension credit contributions, nor was her job designed such that            
          it would be realistically possible to do so.  Despite the fact              
          that Mrs. Colombell received no tax benefit whatsoever from her             
          “participation” in Inova’s retirement plan, the Court is not free           
          to rewrite the law.  See, e.g., Hildebrand v. Commissioner, 683             
          F.2d 57, 59 (3d Cir. 1982), affg. T.C. Memo. 1980-532; Johnson v.           
          Commissioner, 661 F.2d 53, 54-55 (5th Cir. 1981), affg. 74 T.C.             
          1057 (1980).  We must conclude that petitioner was, for Internal            
          Revenue Code purposes, an active participant in Inova’s                     
          retirement plan in 2002.                                                    
                                     Conclusion                                       
               The tax code is complex, see generally Cheek v. United                 
          States, 498 U.S. 192, 199-200 (1991), and we must enforce the               
          laws as written and interpreted, see Marsh & McLennan Cos. v.               
          United States, 302 F.3d 1369, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Philadelphia           
          & Reading Corp. v. United States, 944 F.2d 1063, 1074 (3d Cir.              
          1991).  The result in this case is harsh, and unfortunately the             
          Court can appreciate why petitioners will regard it as such.  The           
          regulation in its current form, the validity of which has not               
          been called into question, dictates the result.  The Court may              


               7(...continued)                                                        
          individual’s rights under the plan are forfeitable, was then                
          found only in the legislative history.  See H. Rept. 93-807, at             
          129 (1974), 1974-3 C.B. (Supp.) 236, 364.                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011