- 2 - Held: The administrative record and notices of determination underlying these cases are sufficient to support meaningful judicial review. Held, further, the Appeals officer was not disqualified from conducting the collection hearing for 2001 and 2002 on account of prior involvement within the meaning of sec. 6330(b)(3), I.R.C., nor does the record otherwise call into question his impartiality. Held, further, because the record does not show any abuse of discretion, R’s determinations to proceed with collection action, except to the extent modified by settlements between the parties, are sustained. Theodore H. Merriam and Kevin A. Planegger, for petitioners. Frederick J. Lockhart, Jr., for respondent. OPINION WHERRY, Judge: These consolidated cases arise from petitions for judicial review filed in response to Notices of Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320 and/or 6330.1 The issue for decision is whether respondent may proceed with collection of income tax liabilities for years 2000, 2001, and 2002. 1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011