Alfonso J. and Elena L. Diaz del Castillo - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          Petitioners’ argument must fail in this proceeding because our              
          jurisdiction is limited to deciding whether petitioners are                 
          liable for the deficiency determined by respondent.  This Court             
          is without jurisdiction to join unrelated third parties to an               
          individual taxpayer’s deficiency proceeding under the                       
          circumstances of this case.6                                                
               Accordingly, we hold that petitioners are liable for the               
          $2,327.40 income tax deficiency for their 2001 tax year.7  To               
          reflect the foregoing,                                                      
                                        Decision will be entered                      
                                   for respondent.                                    















               6 We note that it is petitioners’ belief that the software             
          caused the error on their return.  The record in this case does             
          not support or reject petitioners’ belief.                                  
               7 As discussed, we note that respondent has acknowledged               
          petitioners’ payment of $1,153.23 in response to respondent’s 30-           
          day letter.  Accordingly, the amount of tax due from petitioners            
          will be less than the determined deficiency.                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  

Last modified: May 25, 2011