- 6 - 1. Elimination of the Thompsons’ Late Filing (Non-Kersting) Addition for 1981 ... 99 2. Respondent’s Failure To Address the Bauspar Issue in the Thompsons’ Statutory Notice for 1981 ............... 100 E. Benefits to the Thompsons Relating to Years Other Than 1979-1981 ............... 100 1. In General .................. 100 2. The Thompsons’ Escape From Kersting Liability with Respect to 1982 ........ 102 3. The Thompsons’ 1983 Kersting Deficiency and the Disappearing Statutory Notice .... 108 4. The Thompsons’ 1983-85 Bauspar Deductions ................. 109 5. The Thompsons’ Deduction of Prepaid Interest on Their 1986 and 1987 Returns ... 111 1986 ..................... 111 1987 ..................... 115 6. The Thompsons’ Attorney’s Fee Deduction for 1993 .............. 117 7. The Thompsons’ Failure To Report Tax Benefit Income for 1993 ......... 119 8. Payment of Witness Fees to Mr. Thompson ... 122 9. Release of Lien on the Thompsons’ Property and Other Intangible Benefits .... 123 F. The Percentage Reduction Summarized ........ 125 G. Additional Relief ................. 126 1. Elimination of Non-Kersting Additions .... 126 2. Allowance of Bauspar Deductions ....... 127 3. Elimination of Non-Kersting Deficiencies ... 127 4. Attorney’s Fees ............... 128 III. Interest on Deficiencies and Overpayments ....... 129Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011