Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al. - Page 70

                                       - 33 -                                         

          virtue of this disposition of the matter, respondent issued no              
          notice of deficiency to the Thompsons for 1984.                             
               On March 4, 1988, DeCastro sent Speers a copy of the                   
          Thompsons’ 1985 income tax return.  As noted above, the                     
          Thompsons’ 1985 income tax return did not reflect any Kersting              
          deductions (although it did include Bauspar deductions).  In a              
          letter dated March 25, 1988, Speers notified the Thompsons that             
          she “was able to verify that interest from the Kersting project             
          was not deducted” on that return.  Respondent issued no notice of           
          deficiency to the Thompsons for 1985.                                       
               E.   The Reporting and Resolution of the Thompsons’                    
                    Deficiency Interest Payments for 1986 and 1987                    
               The Thompsons claimed their $59,545 interest payments to the           
          IRS as an itemized interest deduction on Schedule A - Itemized              
          Deductions of their 1986 income tax return.  However, because               
          their adjusted gross income for that year was relatively low, the           
          Thompsons were able to use only $16,251 of the $59,545 deduction.           
          The Thompsons did not claim any Kersting or Bauspar deductions on           
          their 1986 return.                                                          
               Poltash prepared the Thompsons’ 1987 income tax return.  On            
          that return, the Thompsons deducted $27,914 as interest paid to             
          the IRS.  That figure represents 65 percent of $42,945.  See                
          supra note 14.  Apparently, the Thompsons were attempting to                
          carry over the unused portion of the interest deduction of                  






Page:  Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011