Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al. - Page 94

                                       - 57 -                                         

          1986 and 1987 returns ($16,251 for 1986 and $27,914 for 1987),              
          the interest on the reduced deficiencies that were ultimately               
          assessed in 1993 amounted to only $27,506 ($15,371 for 1980 and             
          $12,135 for 1981).  Pursuant to written advice from DeCastro, the           
          Thompsons deducted the fees paid to him in 1993 totaling $51,225            
          ($32,225 + $19,000) in computing their taxable income.  The                 
          description accompanying the deduction claim on the Thompsons’              
          1993 return was “LEGAL FEES FOR INCLUDABLE INC.”25                          
               J.   Respondent’s Disciplinary Action                                  
                    Against Sims and McWade                                           
               On July 29, 1993, Sanchez sent notices of proposed                     
          disciplinary action to Sims and McWade.  The notices asserted               
          that Sims and McWade had violated:  (1) Department of the                   
          Treasury Minimum Standards of Conduct, section 0.735-30(a)(2) (an           
          employee shall avoid any action which might result in or create             
          the appearance of giving preferential treatment to any person);             
          (2) Department of the Treasury Minimum Standards of Conduct,                
          section 0.735-30(a)(6) (an employee shall avoid any action that             
          might adversely affect the confidence of the public in the                  
          integrity of the Government); and (3) IRS Rule of Conduct 214.5             


          25The reference to “INCLUDABLE INC.” has not been                           
          satisfactorily explained, even by Poltash, whose office prepared            
          the return.  Petitioners urge that the reference is to “an entity           
          that never existed.”  The Court doubts the reference is to an               
          entity at all, but the Court’s question to Poltash, whether the             
          reference was a shorthand reference to “includable income”, as a            
          justification for deductibility under sec. 212, met with a                  
          protestation of ignorance.                                                  




Page:  Previous  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011