J. McLean and Judy A. Durfey - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $3,643 in petitioners’           
          Federal income tax for 2002.  The issue for decision is whether             
          J. McLean Durfey (petitioner) received unreported income in the             
          year 2002 from wages, interest, a State income tax refund, the              
          taxable amount of a pension, and the taxable amount of Social               
          Security benefits.1                                                         
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          Petitioners resided in American Fork, Utah, when they filed their           
          petition.                                                                   
               Petitioner is an educator.  He and his wife filed a timely             
          joint Federal income tax return for 2002 in which they reported             
          wages of $52,399, a farming loss of $11,028, and adjusted gross             
          income of $41,371.  Third parties reported to petitioner and                
          respondent the following income paid to petitioner in 2002 that             
          was not reported on petitioners’ Federal income tax return for              
          that year:                                                                  







               1The adjustment of $1,495 for medical deductions claimed on            
          Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, made by respondent in the notice           
          of deficiency is computational based upon an increase in                    
          petitioners’ adjusted gross income.  Likewise, the adjustment of            
          $296 to Schedule A miscellaneous deductions is computational                
          based upon petitioners’ adjusted gross income.                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011