Andrew J. Eberly and Ruthanne E. Eberly - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          decedent’s distribution from the TIAA-CREF accumulated annuity              
          funds.                                                                      
               Petitioners did not include the $150,000 distribution                  
          petitioner constructively received from his father’s estate on              
          their timely filed, joint 2000 Federal income tax return.                   
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that the            
          $150,000 constructively received by petitioner is includable in             
          petitioners’ income as income in respect of a decedent under                
          section 691.  Other adjustments made in the notice of deficiency            
          are computational and not in dispute.                                       
          Discussion                                                                  
               At the outset we note that petitioners now acknowledge the             
          errors made on decedent’s final Federal income tax return and               
          estate tax return.  They distance themselves from those errors              
          and also retreat from their position taken earlier that, if                 
          otherwise includable in their income, the $150,000 distribution             
          was subject to exclusion on account of the “roll over”.                     
          Respondent does not suggest that any of these errors in any way             
          estop petitioners from their present position that the $150,000             
          distribution, constructive or otherwise, was an excludable                  
          inheritance, see sec. 102(a), and not income in respect of a                
          decedent within the meaning of section 691(a).  Furthermore,                
          nothing in the record suggests that there has been any                      
          deviousness or mischief surrounding the dates reflected on the              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011