-24- transfer tax purposes, and we give it no respect. See Commissioner v. Procter, 142 F.2d 824 (4th Cir. 1944); Ward v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 78 (1986); Harwood v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 239 (1984), affd. without published opinion 786 F.2d 1174 (9th Cir. 1986). See generally Rev. Rul. 65-144, 1965-1 C.B. 442. We hold for respondent. We have considered all arguments by petitioners for a contrary holding and find those arguments not discussed herein to be without merit. To reflect the arbitrator’s valuation of the Great Bay stock, Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Last modified: May 25, 2011