-24-
transfer tax purposes, and we give it no respect. See
Commissioner v. Procter, 142 F.2d 824 (4th Cir. 1944); Ward v.
Commissioner, 87 T.C. 78 (1986); Harwood v. Commissioner, 82 T.C.
239 (1984), affd. without published opinion 786 F.2d 1174 (9th
Cir. 1986). See generally Rev. Rul. 65-144, 1965-1 C.B. 442.
We hold for respondent. We have considered all arguments by
petitioners for a contrary holding and find those arguments not
discussed herein to be without merit. To reflect the
arbitrator’s valuation of the Great Bay stock,
Decisions will be entered
under Rule 155.
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Last modified: May 25, 2011