- 9 - Therefore, petitioner is not allowed a deduction for the contribution of his truck in 2000. Additionally, petitioner claims that he is entitled to a deduction for the $1,556.66 of union dues that he paid in 2000 and for the $565 casualty loss in 2001. A taxpayer may either elect the standard deduction allowed by statute or, in the event his deductions amount to more than the standard deduction for that year, elect to itemize his deductions on Schedule A, Itemized Deductions. See secs. 63(b), 67. The standard deductions for a single taxpayer in 2000 and 2001 were $4,400 and $4,550, respectively. Sec. 63(c)(2). In the absence of other evidence, neither the deduction of $1,556.66 in 2000 nor $565 in 2001 establishes petitioner’s right to deductions in excess of the standard deductions allowed by respondent. (With respect to the casualty loss, his deduction would also be limited or eliminated by section 165(h).) Additions to Tax Respondent determined an addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) for failure to file the 2000 return. Respondent conceded the addition to tax for the similar 2001 return. Respondent has the burden of production to show that petitioner did not file his 2000 return. Sec. 7491(c). To avoid the addition to tax, petitioner has the burden of proving that the failure to file did not result from willful neglect and was duePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011