Carlos H. and Maria C. Gonzalez - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
               this alleged business on their returns for 2000 and 2001.              
               The mere reporting of this activity does not prove its                 
               existence.  Other than their testimony, and a series of                
               documents generated by them, there is no evidence in the               
               record to establish that there even was an activity.                   
               Petitioners presented no checks, receipts, or any other                
               third party documents to prove they conducted a business.              
               They claimed to have an office in Colombia, but again, they            
               only presented computer generated accounting records to                
               support the existence of their Colombia operation.  Further,           
               there was no evidence presented regarding the source of the            
               capital necessary to operate in Colombia, or how it was                
               transmitted to that location.  They presented no checks,               
               wire transfers, or other physical evidence to establish                
               funding.  Petitioners conceded a portion of their claimed              
               Colombia “office” expense when respondent determined that              
               the location of the alleged office was an apartment                    
               building.  Thus, before the Court begins examining the                 
               various factors associated with activities entered into for            
               profit, the Court must first determine if there was in fact            
               any activity to judge.  Respondent asserts that it is                  
               altogether inconceivable that petitioners would be without a           
               single third party record if they in fact operated a                   
               business in two separate countries.                                    

               Section 183(a) provides in general that, in the case of an             
          activity engaged in by an individual, if such activity is not               
          engaged in for profit, no deduction is allowable except for                 
          deductions that are otherwise allowable without regard to whether           
          the activity is engaged in for profit, and/or to the extent of              
          the gross income from the activity.                                         
               Section 183, therefore, presupposes the existence of an                
          activity.  As noted above, in the notice of deficiency,                     
          respondent disallowed the claimed deductions on the ground it had           
          not been established that the expenses were incurred and paid.              
          As pointed out by respondent on brief, no statements, bills,                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011