Gerry M. Griggs - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          market value of the residence.  He has failed to show that his              
          points are qualified residence interest.1                                   
               Casualty Loss                                                          
               Petitioner testified that he suffered a casualty loss                  
          consisting of two items:  a “flat tire” on his automobile and “a            
          broken vase or bottle, perfume bottle, large one that my dog                
          broke” that was a gift.  Petitioner submitted to respondent’s               
          counsel a Form 4684, Casualties and Thefts, listing the cost of             
          the tire as $174.62 and the cost of the vase or perfume bottle as           
          $800.                                                                       
               Losses may be deductible under section 165(a) to the extent            
          “not compensated for by insurance or otherwise.”  In the case of            
          an individual, section 165(c)(3) allows a taxpayer to claim as a            
          deduction any loss from theft or casualty sustained during the              
          taxable year.  The loss is allowed only to the extent that it               
          exceeds $100 and the net casualty loss is in excess of 10 percent           
          of adjusted gross income.  Sec. 165(h).  The amount of the loss             
          is the lesser of (1) the fair market value of the property                  
          immediately before the casualty reduced by the fair market value            
          after the casualty, or (2) the adjusted basis of the property.              



               1Were the points qualified residence interest, petitioner              
          would be required to amortize the points over the life of the               
          loan unless he provided sufficient evidence that the loan                   
          proceeds were used to purchase or improve the residence.  Sec.              
          461(g)(1) and (2).                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011