-9- Income Tax Regs. The phrase “on the business premises” has been construed to mean either (1) living quarters that constitute an integral part of the business property or (2) premises on which the employer carries on some of its business activities. See Dole v. Commissioner, supra at 707. Living quarters are generally an integral part of business property if they are physically located on the employer’s premises. Living quarters are also generally an integral part of business property if the employee does enough work for the employer at the living quarters so that the living quarters are identified with the interests of the business and serve important business functions. See Adams v. United States, 218 Ct. Cl. 322, 585 F.2d 1060, 1066-1067 (1978); Johnson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-479. The home of a high-ranking executive has been considered an integral part of the employer’s business when the executive held meetings and business social functions in his home, raising the status of his company. Adams v. United States, supra. Similarly, a hotel manager’s residence has been considered an integral part of the employer’s business when the hotel manager could observe the hotel from his home, worked from home in the evenings, and also occasionally entertained important hotel guests in his home. Lindeman v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 609 (1973). Conversely, living quarters physically located off the worksite are not integral to the employer’s business unless thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011