Terri L and Austin W. Hartsock - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          record before us, we agree with respondent.                                 
               Petitioners’ focus at trial and on brief is on the gambling            
          losses that they contend they incurred during the years at issue            
          at Harrah’s.7  Mr. Hartsock testified that petitioners calculated           
          their claimed gambling losses at Harrah’s by using the minimum              
          amount required to be wagered in each slot machine that they                
          played at Harrah’s as shown on the respective Harrah’s substitute           
          Forms W-2G with respect to August 13 and 14 and September 4,                
          1999, the respective times of gambling winnings as shown on such            
          respective forms, and the respective amounts that they estimated            
          they would have been able to wager within a minute in each such             
          slot machine that they played at Harrah’s if they had played two            
          coins at one time.8  In support of Mr. Hartsock’s testimony,                


               7According to petitioners, “The gambling losses allowed by             
          the Respondent for both years in question were those incurred at            
          all of the casinos that the Petitioners gambled in during those             
          years, except for Harrah’s.”                                                
               8As we understand the way in which petitioners calculated              
          their claimed gambling losses at Harrah’s, petitioners multiplied           
          the number of minutes between gambling winnings at a $100 slot              
          machine or a $25 slot machine, as reflected on the respective               
          Harrah’s substitute Forms W-2G with respect to Aug. 13 and 14 and           
          Sept. 4, 1999, by the amount that they estimated they would have            
          been able to wager within a minute in such a $100 slot machine or           
          such a $25 slot machine if they had played two coins at one time.           
          Mr. Hartsock testified that he would have been able to wager                
          within a minute $1,200, “give or take $200”, in a $100 slot                 
          machine and $300 in a $25 slot machine.  Mr. Hartsock testified             
          that petitioners reduced the amount so calculated to reflect that           
          they would not have been constantly wagering in slot machines               
          that they were playing because they would have stopped wagering             
          to light up cigarettes, get drinks, or talk with others.                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011