Harvey L. Hoover - Page 39

                                       - 39 -                                         
          savings bonds with face values of $1,000 each.  Petitioner failed           
          to comply with the District Court’s order and transferred 150 of            
          those bonds to his son Michael Hoover.  Because petitioner had              
          fraudulently attempted to evade his tax liability and had                   
          previously attempted to transfer his assets to his son in an                
          attempt to elude a court order, we hold that respondent did not             
          abuse his discretion when he concluded that the collection of               
          taxes, interest, and penalties petitioner owed was in jeopardy.             
          VII.  Conclusion                                                            
               The assessment of the determined deficiency for 1989 is                
          barred by the 3-year statute of limitations.  Petitioner                    
          fraudulently understated his taxable income on his returns for              
          1990, 1991, and 1992 and is liable for fraud penalties pursuant             
          to section 6663.  Section 6501(c), the fraud exception to the               
          normal 3-year statute of limitations, applies so that the                   
          assessments for 1990, 1991, and 1992 are not barred by the                  
          statute of limitations.  The determination to uphold the jeopardy           
          levy and the notice of Federal tax lien for the 1990, 1991, and             
          1992 tax liabilities was not an abuse of discretion.                        

                                        Decision will be entered under Rule           
                                        155 in docket No. 15557-99, and an            
                                        appropriate decision will be                  
                                        entered in docket No. 4590-00L.               







Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  

Last modified: May 25, 2011