Danny Holloway and Patti Bain Holloway - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          notice is not directly appealable to the Tax Court.  However, a             
          taxpayer may request an abatement of the increased liability                
          within 60 days, which the Commissioner must grant.  If the                  
          Commissioner still thinks he was right, he must send a notice of            
          deficiency to the taxpayer.  The normal rules for petitioning               
          this Court for redetermination of that deficiency then kick in.             
          See sec. 6213(b)(2).                                                        
               Instead of demanding an abatement and waiting for a notice             
          of deficiency, the Holloways posted a cash bond and then                    
          submitted a written protest requesting a review of the math error           
          notice.4  While reviewing the protest, the Commissioner looked              
          into the Holloways’ adoption credit.  Discovering that the                  
          Holloways were claiming the credit for Danny Holloway’s expenses            
          in adopting his stepchildren--a use specifically disallowed by              
          section 23(d)(1)(C)--the Commissioner sent the Holloways a notice           


               3(...continued)                                                        
          there was a “mathematical or clerical error” on a tax return.               
          See sec. 6213(b)(1), (g)(2).  The Code’s definition of what                 
          counts as a math error includes errors in calculating statutory             
          limits on the kind of credits that the Holloways claimed.  See              
          sec. 6213(g)(2)(E).                                                         
               4 If a taxpayer disagrees with the Commissioner’s proposed             
          tax liability but wants to prevent interest from accruing, he may           
          remit all or a portion of the proposed liability (plus interest             
          due) as a deposit in the nature of a cash bond rather than a                
          payment.  Rev. Proc. 84-58, 1984-2 C.B. 501.  Such a deposit                
          doesn’t earn interest, isn’t subject to a claim for credit or               
          refund as an overpayment, and must be returned to the taxpayer on           
          request at any time before assessment.  Id. sec. 4.02(1), 1984-2            
          C.B. at 502.                                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011