William C. and Josephine Houchin - Page 8

                                        - 8 -                                         
          stipulated dismissal with prejudice.  On February 3, 1999, the              
          U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado dimissed William           
          Houchin from the lawsuit with prejudice.                                    
               The parties stipulated that the correct amount of income               
          received by W.C. Houchin Corp. from the settlement agreement with           
          Exxon and ARCO for the purpose of calculating any income                    
          adjustment is $6,145,315.5                                                  
               Petitioner W.C. Houchin Corp. did not report the royalty               
          income received from the settlement on its 1998 corporate income            
          tax return.  Petitioner W.C. Houchin Corp. reported the royalty             
          income and related settlement expenses on its corporate return              
          for 1999, the first year for which the corporation elected S                
          corporation status.  Petitioners William and Josephine Houchin              
          reported the royalty income received from the settlement, among             
          other settlement-related items, as flowthrough items on their               
          1999 individual Federal income tax return.                                  
                                       OPINION                                        
          I.  Settlement-Related Deficiency                                           
               A.  Burden of Proof                                                    
               Section 7491(a) places the burden of proof on the                      
          Commissioner with regard to certain factual issues relevant to              
          ascertaining liability for tax in the case of Court proceedings             
          arising from examinations commenced after July 22, 1998.                    

               5  See supra note 4.                                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011