Daniel Hubbard - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          Federal income tax withheld.                                                
               Petitioner attached to the return a 2-page typewritten                 
          statement containing frivolous and groundless tax protester                 
          arguments such as: (1) No section of the Internal Revenue Code              
          establishes an income tax liability or requires that he pay taxes           
          on the basis of a return; (2) the Privacy Act provides that he is           
          not required to file a return; (3) a Form 1040 with zeros is a              
          valid return; (4) he has no income under the definition of income           
          in Merchants Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U.S. 509 (1921);            
          (5) his return is not frivolous; (6) no Internal Revenue Service            
          employee has been delegated authority to determine whether a                
          return is frivolous or to impose a frivolous return penalty; (7)            
          the frivolous return penalty may not be applied to him because no           
          legislative regulation implements it; (8) no statute allows the             
          IRS to prepare a return for him because he has filed a “return”;            
          and (9) income, for purpose of the Federal income tax, “can only            
          be a derivative of corporate activity.”                                     
               In a letter dated August 13, 2002, respondent advised                  
          petitioner that although he had received petitioner’s 2000                  
          return, it could not be processed.  Respondent informed                     
          petitioner in this letter that his arguments were frivolous and             
          without merit.  Respondent prepared a substitute return for                 
          petitioner.  On August 13, 2002, respondent sent petitioner a 30-           
          day letter, in which respondent adjusted petitioner’s income tax            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011