- 9 - be paid to petitioner’s former spouse when distributions are made from the plan in the future. The formula merely fixes the share of retirement funds that is to be allotted to petitioner’s former spouse. Accordingly, we hold that petitioner’s contributions to his Government retirement plan are not deductible alimony payments. Additionally, petitioner contends that he may deduct medical insurance payments because the order pendente lite directed him to maintain medical coverage which was in effect during the entire taxable year 2002. Petitioner contends that he elected his coverage during the open enrollment period at the end of 2001 and that his election was effective for 2002. At trial, petitioner testified as follows regarding the manner in which he calculated the amount of the deduction for medical insurance: When I determined my taxes I went ahead and put in half of what I paid for medical insurance because I figured I am half, she’s half. She also had custody of the children, so I looked at that as making the difference between family plan and single plan would have given me a bigger value, but at the time I didn’t pay attention to the difference. I just took half, prorated it for the year. I put that in as alimony per the example in the IRS publication. I was under court order to provide the insurance. Respondent contends that, while the order pendente lite ordered petitioner to maintain existing medical coverage, the order was superseded by the March 22, 2002, divorce decree which ordered petitioner to maintain medical insurance for the minor children but did not mention petitioner’s former spouse.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011