Alvin S. Kanofsky - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
               The determination of whether a taxpayer acted with                     
               reasonable cause and in good faith is made on a case-                  
               by-case basis, taking into account all pertinent facts                 
               and circumstances.  * * *  Circumstances that may                      
               indicate reasonable cause and good faith include an                    
               honest misunderstanding of * * * law that is reasonable                
               in light of all of the facts and circumstances,                        
               including the experience, knowledge, and education of                  
               the taxpayer.  * * *                                                   
          Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.                                       
               B.  Analysis and Conclusion                                            
               On brief, respondent alleges that petitioner’s failure “to             
          maintain and produce adequate records of his alleged business               
          activities” shows both negligence and intentional disregard of              
          the section 6001 requirement to keep permanent records to                   
          establish his gross income and deductions.  Respondent also                 
          argues that “petitioner has not offered any evidence * * * that             
          he acted reasonably and in good faith in filing his 1997 tax                
          return.”  Petitioner disagrees.                                             
               From his testimony, we infer that, both before and during              
          the years at issue, petitioner was seeking to use one or more of            
          his three investment properties in the conduct of a trade or                
          business.  Respondent does not challenge that testimony, and we             
          have no reason to disbelieve it.8  Petitioner’s error was to                
          treat the expenses associated with his attempts to establish a              
          business operation at one or more of his properties (essentially            

               8  Petitioner’s testimony is consistent with the examining             
          agent’s determination to treat certain of petitioner’s Schedule C           
          expenses for 1997 as either deductible (on Schedule A) or                   
          capitalizable expenses associated with “rental property”.                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011