Estate of Ronald G. Keeton, Deceased, Kimberly Keeton Spence, Personal Representative - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
                         decedent or a member of the                                  
                         decedent’s family in the operation                           
                         of the business to which such                                
                         interests relate.                                            
               The parties have stipulated that the estate has satisfied              
          the requirements listed in section 2057(b)(1)(A) and (B).  The              
          parties have also stipulated that the only dispute is whether the           
          stipulated facts demonstrate that the estate has satisfied the              
          requirements of section 2057(b)(1)(C) and (D).                              
          II. Evolution of the Parties’ Current Positions                             
               In his notice of deficiency, respondent gave the following             
          explanation for denying the deduction:                                      
               It is determined that the deduction claimed under                      
               Section 2057 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is                   
               not allowed because during the eight year period ending                
               on the date of the Decedent’s death there were not                     
               periods aggregating five years or more during which                    
               such interests were owned by the Decedent or a member                  
               of the Decedent’s family.  Therefore the sum of the                    
               adjusted value of the family-owned business interests                  
               plus the amount of gifts of such interests does not                    
               exceed 50% of the adjusted gross estate.                               
               In its petition and opening brief, the estate argued that              
          there were periods aggregating 5 years or more during which                 
          decedent owned both Keeton Corrections and NSP.  The estate                 
          asserted that the language of section 2057(b)(1)(D) refers to               
          “such interests” and does not require that each individual                  
          interest in a corporation meet the 5-year requirement.  The                 
          estate asserted that the two corporations should be viewed as one           
          collective business because the incorporation of NSP, which                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011