Hugh G. and Norma J. King - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          Sec. 7491(a).  Petitioners do not contend that section 7491                 
          applies.  Thus, petitioners bear the burden of proving that the             
          determinations in the notice of deficiency are in error.  Rule              
          142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                       
               Before relying on this presumption to establish that the               
          taxpayer has unreported income, the Commissioner must introduce             
          evidence linking the taxpayer to an income-producing activity.              
          Blohm v. Commissioner, 994 F.2d 1542, 1549 (11th Cir. 1993),                
          affg. T.C. Memo. 1991-636; Weimerskirch v. Commissioner, 596 F.2d           
          358, 361-362 (9th Cir. 1979), revg. 67 T.C. 672 (1977).                     
          Petitioners contend that respondent did not do so.  We disagree.            
          It is undisputed that petitioners engaged in several income-                
          producing activities.  Thus, the deficiency determination is                
          presumed to be correct, and petitioners have the burden of                  
          proving it is incorrect.  See Blohm v. Commissioner, supra.                 
               Petitioners further contend that respondent failed to                  
          thoroughly review their books and records.  We disagree.  Nothing           
          in the record suggests respondent did not properly consider the             
          records petitioners provided.                                               
                    b. Whether Respondent Correctly Determined That                   
                         Petitioners Received Taxable Layaway Payments in             
                         the Amount of $39,469 in 1995                                
               Respondent determined that petitioners received, but failed            
          to report, $39,469 of income from layaway sales in 1995.                    







Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011