Dale Kinslow - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          Memo. 2002-51.  Moreover, Mr. Luhmann’s declaration verified that           
          the notice and demand for tax was sent to petitioner within 60              
          days of the assessment.                                                     
               Accordingly, we hold both that respondent was in compliance            
          with all legal and administrative procedures with respect to the            
          CDP action, and that petitioner conceded all other issues by not            
          providing a clear and concise assignment of error.                          
          II.  CDP Not More Intrusive Than Necessary                                  
               Rule 331(b)(4) requires that a petition must contain clear             
          and concise assignments of each and every error that the taxpayer           
          alleges to have been committed in the notice of determination,              
          including whether the proposed collection action is more                    
          intrusive than necessary.  Any issue not otherwise raised in                
          these assignments of error is deemed conceded.  Id.  Petitioner             
          did not raise any issue with respect to whether or not the                  
          proposed collection action was more intrusive than necessary in             
          his petition.  Accordingly, and pursuant to Rule 331(b)(4), we              
          hold that petitioner conceded this issue.                                   
          III.  Concession of Issues at CDP Hearing                                   
               Section 6330(c)(2)(A) provides:                                        
                         (A) In general.--The person may raise at the                 
                    hearing any relevant issue relating to the unpaid tax             
                    or the proposed levy, including--                                 
                              (i) appropriate spousal defenses;                       
                              (ii) challenges to the appropriateness of               
                         collection actions; and                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011